Recent reports have described arsenic levels in a variety of foods including:
This document can help you understand what is known about this issue.
Arsenic is a naturally occurring element, found widely in the environment. It is present in some types of rock and soil. It is used in a number of industrial processes. It is found in measurable amounts in most seafood and in many grains and vegetables.
Arsenic-containing compounds can be classified into two groups: “organic” and “inorganic”. Organic arsenic compounds are usually produced by an animal that has metabolized the inorganic arsenic into a less toxic form and vary in toxicity. The organic arsenic compounds found in seafood are thought to be nontoxic.
Arsenic may be found in drinking water, especially water from wells that draw from groundwater flowing through bedrock containing arsenic. U.S. municipal water supplies should meet the EPA guideline for inorganic arsenic of less than 10 ppb (10 micrograms per kg of water, which is equal to 0.010 milligram per liter of water). Arsenic in some U.S. well water exceeds the EPA recommendation, but rarely rises to very high levels. In parts of Taiwan, Bangladesh, and India, extremely high arsenic levels have been found in drinking water.
Arsenic may also be found in many soils. It occurs naturally in soil in many parts of the U.S. and around the world. It may also be present in soils as a result of the use of arsenic-containing pesticides or the application of fertilizers containing poultry waste contaminated with arsenic, due to the addition of arsenic-containing compounds to some poultry feed to prevent disease and promote growth. Recent reports have targeted rice, rice products and apple juice, because rice fields and apple orchards are sited on fields where for decades arsenic-containing pesticides were used (either on cotton fields where rice is now grown, or in orchards which remain in use).
Seafood, both farm-raised and seafood caught in the wild, often has the highest total arsenic levels of all foods. However, arsenic in seafood is present almost entirely in the nontoxic organic arsenic forms, unless the fish is caught in waters polluted by industrial chemicals.
Among foods tested by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, some vegetables and rice have the highest levels of inorganic arsenic, although these levels are still relatively low.
What we know about health effects from arsenic is based on long term exposure to very high exposures, such as in populations exposed to contaminated water in Taiwan, India and Bangladesh or from those occupationally exposed at smelters and agricultural sites. Short term health effects after high level exposure generally include symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and diarrhea, but are extremely unlikely to occur at the levels observed in studies of typical U.S. foods. The long-term problem with arsenic includes its association with a variety of cancers (skin cancer, lung cancer, and bladder cancer) as well as its contribution to skin changes, heart disease, lung disease, neurologic disease, kidney disease, and type 2 diabetes. Generally, these diseases are seen with high levels of arsenic exposure, above what is found in drinking water in the United States.
The health effects of very low-level arsenic in foods, as described in these recent reports, are less clear. Several studies of populations outside of the United States raise concerns about a possible cumulative effect of long-term low-level exposure to arsenic (possibly at levels higher than anticipated from ingesting normal amounts of these food products) on learning and neuromotor function.
Currently, there is no level of inorganic arsenic exposure that has been shown to be completely safe, but most experts believe that ingestion of these small amounts of arsenic pose minimal risk when eaten as part of a balanced diet. There have been no long-term follow-up studies of populations exposed through food at the very low levels experienced in the U.S. that have attempted to answer this question, although we can take some direction from guidance developed for drinking water.
While different policy experts have reached different conclusions about the maximum amount that can be eaten safely, in general, the less arsenic the better.
Although it is not usually necessary, laboratory testing is available for use and is done by measuring arsenic in the urine. The urine arsenic test can measure arsenic consumed over the last few days. Before obtaining such a test, consult with your physician or an expert in toxicology to be sure that the urine is collected under conditions most likely to give an accurate result. Both inorganic and organic arsenic will be combined together into one value unless their separate analysis is specifically ordered. While the test can determine if the recent exposure was above average, it cannot determine the likelihood of specific health effects.
Various public health authorities provide recommendations developed in different ways. Each recommendation provides different levels balancing safety against cost, feasibility, and other factors.
Drinking water:
Food:
Seafood has been found to contain the highest concentration of arsenic; however, except in very rare circumstances, the vast majority of arsenic in seafood is in a nontoxic organic form of arsenic. Among other foods tested by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, vegetables and rice have the highest levels of the toxic inorganic form of arsenic. Other foods and fruits, including apples and grapes, also contribute small amounts of arsenic to the human diet.
The risk of arsenic from all sources is estimated based on a lifetime exposure. The risk from eating foods with more arsenic on some days may be balanced by eating other foods with less arsenic on other days. Daily drinking and cooking with water at 10 ppb, the highest level permitted by U.S. EPA regulations, in a typical amount would contribute as much as ½ a serving of average rice cereal.
Since infants eat a more limited diet, their exposure to arsenic may be higher than in people who are eating a more varied diet.
The recent reports of arsenic content in rice are consistent with previous studies done by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The recent findings by Consumer Reports (November 2012) and the FDA (September 2012) suggest that some rice products have higher inorganic arsenic than others and often depends on where the rice is grown. Additional studies are under way by the FDA.
Based on these early studies, it has been calculated that eating regular amounts of these products over a lifetime could increase the risk of some cancers by a very small amount. The effects on a developing child’s brain at similar levels are less clear.
Clear recommendations do not exist regarding balancing the potential hazard associated with arsenic exposure with the benefits of a balanced diet that includes dietary products that are known to contain small amounts of arsenic. If choosing substitutes for rice, consider carefully the health benefits of the alternatives and remember to eat a diverse diet with an emphasis on whole, unprocessed foods.
The American Academy of Pediatrics notes that single grain cereals like rice cereal are commonly the first solid foods introduced into an infant’s diet. However, the specific order in which solid foods are started in an infant’s diet has not been shown to be important. Each new food should be started one at a time, and additional foods can be added every three days.
Until we know more, concerned families can:
Families with concerns about the relationship between the environment and children’s health should contact their health care provider or the Pediatric Environmental Health Specialty Unit serving their area. Health care providers with similar concerns are also encouraged to contact the Pediatric Environmental Health Specialty Unit serving their area. http://www.pehsu.net
Last revised October 1, 2012
Lead author: Robert J. Geller, MD, Southeast Pediatric Environmental Health Specialty Unit, Emory University Department of Pediatrics, Atlanta GA Acknowledgements: Thanks to many colleagues, including Ada Otter DNP, Matt Karwowski, MD, Perry Sheffield MD, Larry Lowry PhD, Susan Buchanan MD, Jerry Paulson MD, Jennifer Lowry MD, Mark Miller MD, Rose Goldman, MD, Alan Woolf, MD, Maida Galvez MD, Catherine Karr MD, PhD, Joel Forman MD, Irena Buka MD, Chethan Sarabu, Juliette Merchant, and Nicole Makris, for their helpful comments and contributions to this document. This document was developed by the Association of Occupational and Environmental Clinics (AOEC) and funded under the cooperative agreement award number 1U61TS000118-04 from the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR).
Acknowledgement: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) supports the PEHSU by providing funds to ATSDR under Inter-Agency Agreement number DW-75-92301301-0. Neither EPA nor ATSDR endorse the purchase of any commercial products or services mentioned in PEHSU publications.