In February 2014, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) released a statement on the off-label use of drugs in pediatric patients. As the AAP pointed out, changes in the federal regulations and incentives for pediatric drug research over the last decade have led the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and pharmaceutical companies to add pediatric guidance to the prescribing labels for more than 500 medications.
Yet, the topic of off-label use remains highly important in pediatrics and public health, because many medications prescribed for children in the U.S. today have never been studied in children.
"While the rate can vary greatly depending on the specialty and environment, in general, less than 50 percent of medication labels have any guidance for providers on a drug's use in children," says Florence Bourgeois, MD, MPH, an emergency physician at Boston Children's Hospital who studies pediatric drug development practices. "At an academic medical center, that rate might even be as high as 60 to 80 percent for the medications used among hospitalized patients."
However, lack of child-specific prescribing guidance does not mean that the FDA prohibits a given drug's use in children. Nor does it mean that the drug is experimental or requires special consent from the patient's family or guardian.
Rather, it means that there are no data or "substantial evidence" from "adequate and well-controlled investigations" upon which the FDA can make a determination either way regarding that drug's safety and effectiveness in children.
"'Off-label' use has negative connotations, but a lack of pediatric guidance is not the same as if a drug were to have a pediatric contraindication," Bourgeois explains. "Rather, it points to a paucity in the evidence about how a given drug should be used."